Maxforce blog
What Eighty-Two Milligrams Buys
One gummy a day, 82 mg of a nine-ingredient blend, and three supplied price cards that do not say which pack they belong to. This post does the arithmetic.
82 mg of blend per serving
One gummy, one number, thirty days
Start with the object rather than the argument. A chewable gummy in a black and red jar, thirty gummies in it, and one instruction: “Take 1 gummy once daily as a dietary supplement, or as directed by a qualified health care professional.” Thirty at one a day is thirty days, and the panel agrees with itself — serving size one gummy, servings per container thirty, which not every label in this category manages.
Inside each gummy, one panel line decides the rest. Proprietary Blend, 82 mg, and indented underneath it nine ingredients: muira puama extract, maca extract, catuaba extract, green tea extract, caffeine (5mg), ashwagandha, L-arginine, tribulus terrestris and horny goat weed extract. One total for all nine, and only the caffeine carries its own figure.
Then the price. Three per-bottle figures were supplied, each as its own image: $79, $69 and $49. Not one names the pack it applies to, and this page will not supply the missing half. What three figures and a fixed daily dose do allow is arithmetic.
5 mg, the one printed amount
Where the bounds come from
One printed figure does more work than anybody intended. FDA’s labeling guide requires blend members to be listed “in descending order of predominance by weight”. The printed order is a ranking, so any row carrying its own amount is a ceiling for everything below it and a floor for everything above. Caffeine is fifth, at 5 mg. Three bounds follow.
Ashwagandha, L-arginine, tribulus terrestris and horny goat weed extract are all listed below a 5 mg row. At most, not approximately.
Muira puama, maca, catuaba and green tea extract are listed above it, so they hold at least 20 mg between them.
82 mg, less 5 for the caffeine, less at least 5 each for the three rows between.
None of it is an estimate. The procedure is written out in The Descending Order Trick, and the home page carries an interactive splitter for the same arithmetic.
$2.63 a day at the highest figure supplied
What a day costs, and what a milligram costs
Thirty gummies at one a day is thirty days, so a per-bottle figure is a monthly cost and a thirtieth of it is a day. At $79 that is $2.63 a day; at $69, $2.30; at $49, $1.63. Those are this desk’s arithmetic, not figures printed on the jar.
Now take the step this category never invites and divide again. A day’s supply is 82 mg of blend, so the price of a milligram is the price of the unit actually being sold.
| Figure supplied | A day | Per mg | Per gram |
|---|---|---|---|
| $79 | $2.63 | about 3.2¢ | about $32 |
| $69 | $2.30 | about 2.8¢ | about $28 |
| $49 | $1.63 | about 2.0¢ | about $20 |
This desk’s arithmetic at one gummy a day. Nothing supplied ties any of the three figures to a pack size.
A jar holds 2,460 mg of blend, so a month is under two and a half grams of material at between about $20 and about $32 a gram. Whether that is expensive becomes answerable the moment you know what quantities the published research used.
2-20 grams a day, the range for row seven
The comparison that gives the number meaning
A price per gram means nothing by itself. What gives it meaning is the gap between the bounds above and the amounts the federal pages name.
L-arginine, discussed in grams
NIH’s Office of Dietary Supplements covers L-arginine inside a fact sheet on exercise and athletic performance, and it discusses it in grams a day: “The research to support supplemental arginine as a performance enhancer is limited and conflicting. Overall, it suggests that doses of 2–20 g/day arginine have little to no effect on performance in either anaerobic or aerobic exercise.” Two to twenty grams, and across that whole range the finding is little to no effect. L-arginine is row seven here, capped at 5 mg — a four-hundredth of the bottom of the range.
Ashwagandha, dosed in hundreds of milligrams
The ashwagandha preparations in the trials NCCIH describes are dosed in the hundreds of milligrams. Ashwagandha is row six, so the same rule caps it at 5 mg.
Caffeine, where nothing has to be derived
Here the figure is printed, and the reference point is FDA’s own: “For most adults, the FDA has cited 400 milligrams a day — that’s about two to three 12-fluid-ounce cups of coffee — as an amount not generally associated with negative effects.” This gummy has 5 mg, about an eightieth of that. Both halves of that are true: too little to expect a stimulant effect from, and too little to be a safety concern for most adults.
567 mg of dry powders, whole blend
The footnote, and why it does not rescue this
The jar anticipates the objection. Beside 82 MG Per Serving** sits “** equivalent to approximately 567mg of dry powders” — read as an extract-ratio claim across the whole blend, about 6.9 to 1. It deserves a straight answer.
It is a whole-blend equivalence. No per-ingredient ratio is printed anywhere, so the 567 mg cannot be applied to any single row. Nothing says whether one row is a concentrated extract and another a gentle one.
The arithmetic still does not close the gap. Credit the full 567 mg, split it nine ways, and that is about 63 mg apiece — and even that split is too generous, because the ordering rule says the rows are unequal. Sixty-three milligrams is two orders of magnitude below a gram, against a range quoted in grams. At $79 a bottle it works out at about $4.64 a gram of claimed equivalent, the friendliest figure here, and it comes off the seller’s own footnote.
A ratio is not a standard. ODS: “U.S. law does not require dietary supplements to be standardized. In fact, there is no legal or regulatory definition of the term in the United States.” And: “Teas, tinctures, and extracts have different strengths from one another.” The footnote moves the number and none of the comparisons above it. The panel is transcribed in full on the supplement facts page.
9 of nine members printed, in order
What this label does properly
Everything above criticises a quantity, and it would be dishonest to stop there: on the things a label can control, this one is better than most in its category.
The panel is complete and legible, printing the blend total and all nine members in the required order — the only reason any arithmetic here was possible. The caffeine is itemised at 5 mg inside the blend rather than folded into the total, and that single figure is what makes four ceilings and three floors derivable; a seller minded to reveal as little as possible would have left it out. The other-ingredients line is complete, and the gelling agent is apple pectin rather than gelatin, so the vegetarian mark genuinely holds. The FDA disclaimer sits in its own ruled box, tied by asterisk to all three front claims, and those claims are hedged as May Support rather than asserted.
So the finding is about quantity, not honesty. The ingredients page applies the same bounds one row at a time.
60 days from purchase, not from the jar
What to do with the number
Price the quantity, not the name. The question is not whether you would pay $2.63 a day for nine botanicals. It is whether you would pay it for 82 mg of blend in which four named rows are capped at 5 mg each. Put that way, most people answer quickly, either way.
Check which figure you are charged. Nothing supplied ties a figure to a pack, so the only binding number is the one at the checkout; divide that by thirty. The pricing page sets the price cards beside the pack renders.
Note the date you pay. The money-back window is 60 days from purchase, not from the first gummy, so two jars is the only supply that fits it exactly and six leaves four sealed jars on the shelf when it shuts. The wording is on the guarantee page.
And keep the money question separate from the medical one. If something has changed for you, a clinician is what is needed and not this arithmetic. What the federal record says is the subject of the third post and of the category page.
References
Sources
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Dietary Supplement Labeling Guide: Chapter IV, Nutrition Labeling. www.fda.gov. Accessed September 25, 2026.
- NIH Office of Dietary Supplements. Dietary Supplements for Exercise and Athletic Performance. ods.od.nih.gov. Accessed September 25, 2026.
- National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health. Ashwagandha: Usefulness and Safety. www.nccih.nih.gov. Accessed September 25, 2026.
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Spilling the Beans: How Much Caffeine is Too Much?. www.fda.gov. Accessed September 25, 2026.
- NIH Office of Dietary Supplements. Botanical Dietary Supplements: Background Information. ods.od.nih.gov. Accessed September 25, 2026.
Order Maxforce from the official page
30 gummies a jar, one gummy a day, thirty days a jar. A proprietary blend of 82 mg holding nine ingredients, of which only the caffeine carries a figure of its own. 60 days from the date of purchase to change your mind. The sales line is +1 (302) 200-3480.
$79, $69 and $49 per bottle were supplied · no pack is named for any of them · the binding figure is the one at the checkout · 60 days from purchase · +1 (302) 200-3480
Next
Keep reading
The 82 mg blend, line by line
The panel line that decides everything else on the jar, and the four bounds the ordering rule hands you for free.
Read it →The three supplied price cards
All three per-bottle figures printed side by side, and the reason none of them can be tied to a pack.
Read it →The descending order trick
The method behind every bound used in this post, written out so you can run it on any blend you meet.
Read it →