Official product information
Maxforce Benefits: Vitality, Drive and Performance on the Jar
Three hedged claims on the jar, three stronger ones on the sales page, and what the federal record holds behind each of them.
Written and reviewed by the Maxforce Editorial Desk · Last updated October 29, 2026
Quick answer
The Maxforce jar says it may support vitality, drive and performance.
Each claim carries an asterisk that leads to the standard supplement disclaimer, printed in its own box on the label.
3 claims, each asterisked
What the jar claims, and why the wording is right
May Support: Vitality, Drive, Performance — hedged, asterisked and disclaimed.
The front of this jar prints three claims and prints them correctly: May Support: Vitality*, Drive*, Performance*. Each is prefaced by may support, each carries an asterisk, and the asterisk resolves to the FDA disclaimer in its own ruled box on the same wrap. That is the correct construction and the product should get credit for it.
Two words do the legal work. May makes it a possibility rather than a promise. Support makes it a contribution to a normal function rather than a treatment for a condition. Strip either out and the sentence becomes a different kind of claim entirely, which is the subject of the next section.
2 surfaces, one gummy
Two surfaces, one product, different verbs
Tap between them. The wording on the first was checked; the wording on the second was written to sell.
Now set the two surfaces against each other. The first is the regulated one, photographed off the jar. The second is the persuasive one, supplied with the pack. They are selling the same gummy.
The regulated surface
- “May Support: Vitality*”
- “May Support: Drive*”
- “May Support: Performance*”
Each asterisk resolves to a disclaimer in its own ruled box: “*These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease.”
The persuasive surface
- “Naturally and effectively support sexual health”
- “Increase vitality and energy to tackle daily challenges”
- “Promote healthy blood circulation to support cardiovascular function”
No asterisk resolves any of those three to a disclaimer in the supplied copy. Increase and promote are not hedges, and vitality has become sexual health and cardiovascular function — considerably more specific things.
There is a gap between the jar and the sales page, and it runs in the direction you would expect. The jar says “May Support: Vitality*, Drive*, Performance*” — hedged, asterisked, disclaimed. The sales copy supplied with the pack says “Naturally and effectively support sexual health”, “Increase vitality and energy to tackle daily challenges” and “Promote healthy blood circulation to support cardiovascular function”. May support became effectively support, and increase and promote are not hedges at all.
6 claims, two surfaces
Six claims, and what sits behind each
Six claims, three from the jar and three from the sales page, each set against what the federal record holds. Every quotation is verbatim.
| Claim | Where it appears | What the federal record holds |
|---|---|---|
| Vitality | the jar | No federal page supports any of these nine for vitality, and five of the nine have no federal consumer page at all. |
| Drive | the jar | NCCIH on this category: “No complementary health approaches have been shown to be safe and effective for sexual enhancement or treating erectile dysfunction (ED).” |
| Performance | the jar | NIH ODS on arginine, the row this leans on: “The research to support supplemental arginine as a performance enhancer is limited and conflicting. Overall, it suggests that doses of 2–20 g/day arginine have little to no effect on performance in either anaerobic or aerobic exercise.” That row is capped at 5 mg here. |
| Sexual health | sales copy only | NCCIH: “Currently, there is no definite evidence that any herbal products are effective or safe for ED.” This is the claim the jar does not make. |
| Energy | sales copy only | The only energy ingredient with a printed amount is caffeine, at 5 mg. FDA: “For most adults, the FDA has cited 400 milligrams a day — that’s about two to three 12-fluid-ounce cups of coffee — as an amount not generally associated with negative effects.” |
| Circulation | sales copy only | The mechanism is real and ODS states it: “First, some arginine is converted to nitric oxide, a potent vasodilator that can increase blood flow and the delivery of oxygen and nutrients to skeletal muscle.” ODS is describing skeletal muscle during exercise, at 2 to 20 grams a day. |
None of these rows supports the claim beside it, which is a finding about the evidence base for the category as much as about this jar.
1 verdict, from NCCIH
NCCIH’s verdict, and the two findings that cut the other way
One sentence on the category, and both sides of the two ingredients with something behind them.
This product is sold under two words printed on its own jar: male enhancement. There is a federal page about that category specifically, and it is the plainest sentence on this site. NCCIH: “No complementary health approaches have been shown to be safe and effective for sexual enhancement or treating erectile dysfunction (ED).” And: “Currently, there is no definite evidence that any herbal products are effective or safe for ED.”
Print that once and do not soften it. It is also not the end of a fair account. NCCIH cites a 2017 randomised controlled trial in 86 men in which tribulus terrestris produced a significant improvement in sexual function against placebo over twelve weeks — alongside a 2014 study in 30 men in which it was not more effective than placebo. And NCCIH notes some limited evidence that ashwagandha over two to four months may raise testosterone levels and sperm quality, which are fertility markers rather than erection or libido.
Both findings attach to rows this panel caps at 5 mg: tribulus is row eight, ashwagandha row six. A finding does not travel down to an amount the study did not test.
3 cards, one per claim
The three front claims, turned over
The face is what the jar prints. The back is what the federal record holds and what the panel’s own ordering permits.
on the jar
Vitality
“May Support: Vitality*”
One of three words on the front, hedged and asterisked to a disclaimer in a ruled box.
Tap to turnno page for five of nine
Vitality
Not a defined outcome and not a measured one. Five of the nine ingredients have no federal consumer page at all.
Tap to turn backon the jar
Drive
“May Support: Drive*”
The second front claim, and the one the sales copy escalates into “sexual health”.
Tap to turnfertility markers, not libido
Drive
Ashwagandha’s federal note is about testosterone and sperm quality, at amounts in the hundreds of milligrams. Row six is capped at 5 mg.
Tap to turn backon the jar
Performance
“May Support: Performance*”
The third front claim. L-arginine and caffeine are the rows it leans on.
Tap to turn2 to 20 g, against 5 mg
Performance
NIH ODS discusses arginine at two to twenty grams a day and says those doses have little to no effect on performance. Row seven is capped at 5 mg.
Tap to turn back30 days to notify, after marketing
The structure/function rule, in FDA’s words
A structure/function claim, in FDA’s wording, may “describe the role of a nutrient or dietary ingredient intended to affect the normal structure or function of the human body”. May support vitality is that kind of claim.
A disease claim is different in kind, and FDA states the consequence: “a product sold as a dietary supplement and represented explicitly or implicitly for treatment, prevention, or cure of a specific disease or class of diseases meets the definition of a drug”. Erectile dysfunction is a diagnosed condition. A supplement that said it treated one would, by that sentence, be a drug.
Any structure/function claim has to carry a disclaimer, and FDA describes what it must say: that “FDA has not evaluated the claim” and that the product “is not intended to ‘diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease’”. This jar carries it, in its own ruled box, tied by asterisk to all three front claims.
And FDA adds the requirement behind the claim: “the manufacturer must have substantiation that the claim is truthful and not misleading and must submit a notification with the text of the claim to FDA no later than 30 days after marketing the dietary supplement with the claim”. Substantiation is held by the company, not published, and not reviewed before sale.
Put those together and the shape of the rule appears. A supplement may say an ingredient contributes to a normal function of the body, and may not say the product treats a condition, because saying so would make it a drug. The evidence behind a permitted claim is held by the company, notified to FDA within thirty days of marketing, and not reviewed before sale. That last clause is the one buyers most often assume the opposite of.
3 questions worth carrying
What a buyer should take from this
The useful habit is small: read the jar, then read the page that sold it to you, and notice which verbs changed. A label is a regulated surface and a sales page is a persuasive one. When a product’s own two surfaces disagree about how strongly to put something, the weaker wording is the one that was checked.
On this product that habit gives a clean result. The jar is the careful surface: three hedged claims, three asterisks, a disclaimer in a ruled box, one ingredient itemised inside the blend, a complete other-ingredients line, a real warning panel and a named distributor with a phone number. The sales page is the other kind of surface, and the verb it changed — may support to effectively support — is the whole of the gap in two words.
So what a buyer should take from this is not a verdict on a company. It is three questions to carry to any jar in this aisle. What does the label claim, in its own words? What did the page that sold it claim, and which verbs changed? And how much of the active material is in a serving? On this product the last one has an unusually good answer for a proprietary blend: 82 mg across nine, with one printed at 5 mg and four capped by it. The label told you. It is the sales page that did not.
Questions
Maxforce FAQ: benefits questions
What is Maxforce?
A dietary supplement in chewable gummy form, sold in a black and red 30-count jar. The label reads “MALE ENHANCEMENT GUMMIES” and “May Support: Vitality*, Drive*, Performance*”. It is not a medicine and it is not FDA-approved.
What does the jar actually claim?
Three things, each hedged and each asterisked: “May Support: Vitality*, Drive*, Performance*”. The asterisk resolves to the FDA disclaimer printed in its own ruled box on the same wrap.
Is that allowed?
Yes. It is a structure/function claim, which FDA permits provided the disclaimer is carried. FDA: such claims “may describe the role of a nutrient or dietary ingredient intended to affect the normal structure or function of the human body”.
What does the sales page claim?
More. “Naturally and effectively support sexual health”, “Increase vitality and energy to tackle daily challenges”, and “Promote healthy blood circulation to support cardiovascular function”. May support became effectively support.
Will this treat erectile dysfunction?
No supplement may claim to. FDA: “a product sold as a dietary supplement and represented explicitly or implicitly for treatment, prevention, or cure of a specific disease or class of diseases meets the definition of a drug.” The jar makes no such claim.
What does the asterisk mean?
It is a legal marker, not a footnote to evidence. It ties the claim to the disclaimer stating that FDA has not evaluated it and that the product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease.
References
Sources for this page
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Structure/Function Claims. www.fda.gov. Accessed September 25, 2026.
- National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health. Dietary Supplements Marketed for Weight Loss, Bodybuilding, and Sexual Enhancement: What the Science Says. www.nccih.nih.gov. Accessed September 25, 2026.
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Questions and Answers on Dietary Supplements. www.fda.gov. Accessed September 25, 2026.
- National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health. Dietary and Herbal Supplements. www.nccih.nih.gov. Accessed September 25, 2026.
- NIH Office of Dietary Supplements. Dietary Supplements for Exercise and Athletic Performance. ods.od.nih.gov. Accessed September 25, 2026.
Next
Keep reading
The mechanism against the federal record
Both tribulus trials, and the row they sit in.
Read it →82 mg, and the bounds it gives up
One printed figure, one ordering rule, and the working in full.
Read it →Who it suits, and who should stop
Three situations where it makes sense and six where it does not.
Read it →See Maxforce on the official sales page
Three hedged claims on the jar and a disclaimer in its own ruled box. 30 gummies a jar, one a day, thirty days. 60 days from purchase to change your mind.
Price shown at checkout · 60-day window from the date of purchase · ships from inside the US · sales line +1 (302) 200-3480